|
ads |
"D3 Questions , Answers and Images"
Workshop at the Ranch
December, 2007 Edition
Hi and welcome to this edition of Workshop at the Ranch.
Well, last month's articles on the new Nikon D3 camera in Workshop
at the Ranch and On The Road created a lot of traffic on my
website. In fact, there were so many people logging on at one
time that the server closed down several times because of the
overload. By the third day of posting, the site had far surpassed
previous numbers of unique visitors. There were many email comments
and questions regarding the new D3 and so I thought I would
address a few questions and show a few more images.
Along with the many complimentary emails I received thanking
me for my D3 articles there were a couple that surprised me
but thought I should try to clear a few things up. I am not
hired by Nikon to write my website articles in Workshop at the
Ranch and On The Road. I speak my own mind and do so freely
and without imposing any financial cost to anyone. Nikon does
not give me equipment to keep. I buy my own gear just like anyone
else. Jody Grober at Roberts Distributors in Indianapolis, Indiana
( 800-726-5544 ) is where I buy all my equipment and have for
over 25 years. I have to purchase my D3 and D300 cameras just
the same as any consumer. The D3 I have been using these past
4 months was supplied by Nikon Tokyo for the purpose of photographing
their brochures and public relations pieces. I do not get to
keep the camera. So, for those who emailed me with suggestions
that I only say good things about the D3 because Nikon pays
me or gives me free equipment to keep, sorry to disappoint you.
I just like the camera a lot. Some emails I received asked why
I did not post my D3 articles sooner. Well, I waited to post
my opinion of the D3 because I wanted to take the time to really
study the camera in many situations other than high ISO sports
venues. I have done several photo shoots using low ISO, 3D Focus
Tracking, Picture Control, Long Exposure, etc, etc, etc, and
made over 75 print enlargements before writing my articles.
Capturing sports images with high ISO settings was my main task
for Nikon, but I very much wanted to see all that was possible
with the D3 so as to offer a complete perspective from more
than just a sports photographer's point of view. OK, let's move
on to your specific questions and I'll try and answer them the
best I can.
|
Question
#1; "I shoot outdoor sports only, why would I need
high ISOs like 1600, 3200 or 6400?"
Answer/Image #1 Rooster Tail ... I of
course shoot many outdoor sports as well and find that
1/1000 of a second shutter speed is still too slow to
perfectly freeze all the action of many sports. Whether
it is dirt thrown from the tires of a motorcycle, grass
kicked up by a football player, ice chips spraying from
the skates of a hockey player, or as with this image of
a water skier, freezing all the water droplets, a higher
ISO will enable the photographer to use faster shutter
speeds above the usual 1/1000. Flying elements like water,
ice, sand, dirt etc tend to look better when completely
frozen in mid air. The Nikon D3 introduces the idea of
ISO400, 500, 640, or even 800 as being considered LOW
ISO settings because there is virtually no noise. A clean
higher ISO also enables the photographer to use a larger
aperture setting for a broader depth of field which is
especially welcome when using long focal length lenses
of 400, 500 and 600mm. Nikon D3, ISO1000, 1/3200 at f5.6,
Nikon 200-400 G VR Zoom Lens, Lexar 8G Flash Card.
|
|
Question
#2; "Dude, is ISO6400 completely noiseless....
and if so, like why wouldn't I use it all the time,
like in bright sunshine?"
Answer/Image Revved Up ... No, ISO6400 is not completely
noiseless. There is some noise at ISO6400. The noise
level in the lit areas is very low and extremely clean.
The darker shadow areas of the picture will have a slightly
higher amount of noise than the lit areas. Some photographers
have compared the ISO6400 noise level of the D3 as being
similar to the ISO400 setting in a D2Xs. As far as using
ISO6400 in bright sunshine I would still rather use
an ISO setting according to the lighting conditions,
but understand that a low ISO can now easily include
ISO400 - ISO800. Images shot at ISO100 (LOW 1) up to
ISO800 are stunning regarding quality and absence of
noise. The ISO settings of 1000-1250 are equally beautiful
in quality and nearly noiseless, especially in the lit
areas of the picture. The terrific image quality continues
with ISO1600, 3200, and 6400 but understand that although
the noise level is still incredibly low there is a slight
increase as the ISO setting increases. ISO1600 looks
better than ISO3200 and ISO3200 looks better than ISO6400.
For the sports photographer I noted some scenarios in
the November 2007 edition of Workshop at the Ranch that
might warrant using very high ISO settings even in bright
day light. These scenarios are explained in detail within
that article ... you might want to re-read that article.
Nikon D3, ISO6400, 1/640 at f2, Nikon 200mm G VR f2
Lens, WB 6670, Lexar 8G Flash Card.
|
Question #3; "Is the high ISO setting of "HI
1" usable or do I need to go no higher than 6400?"
Answer/Image #3A Falcon Run ... As I wrote about
in last month's article, the "HI 1" ISO feature
equates to ISO 12,800. This is a number photographers
can not even think in terms of ....... I personally
had to think about what the ISO number above 6400 would
even be! Yes, it is usable,...and should publish well
in newspapers or magazines and make quality prints.
Many people are talking about what the D3 will do for
the photographer, but a highlight might be what the
camera will do for the general public. Let me explain
... The High School athlete is a great athlete. They
make great pictures, really great pictures, but we,
the general public, seldom see them published because
the indoor gymnasium or night football game is too dark
to use a fast shutter speed to stop the action and still
have good publishable quality. The D3 will allow the
photographer to make good and even excellent pictures
in dreadful lighting situations. ISO 6400 does look
better than 12,800 but as this image shows as well as
the image of football action I posted in November's
Workshop at the Ranch article, ISO 12,800 is a reality.
Nikon D3, ISO12,800 (HI 1), 1/1000 at f5.6, Nikon 400
G VR Lens with TC14E 1.4 Teleconverter, 3D Focus Tracking,
WB Auto, Lexar 8G Flash Card.
Image #3B Falcon Run (close up cropped detail) ... I
have cropped the image for a closer study. This cropped
enlargement illustrates the clean, low noise performance
at ISO12,800 (HI 1). It is also note worthy that the
3D Focus Tracking System works well. Its ability to
track a player through a maze of identical teammates
jerseys is no less that remarkable.
|
Question
#4 "I shoot landscapes and nature scenes for both publication
and print making,...I have a D2Xs, what does the D3 offer
me?"
Answer/Image #4 Fog Along the Hoback
... I do not consider myself to be an expert when it comes
to landscape and nature photography, but I can confidently
say that the D3 offers better pixel quality, sharper details,
greater Dynamic Range, and more precise color rendering
with quality than a D2Xs. I use an Epson Pro Stylus 7600
printer and Epson Premium Luster paper for my in-house
printmaking. I make 16X24 and 24X36 inch prints and it
was evident that the prints I have made with the D3 look
better than those prints made from a D2Xs file. You WILL
notice the improvement. This is why I said in the November
2007 Workshop at the Ranch article that the 12.1 megapixel
Nikon FX Format CMOS Imaging Sensor is the key to the
D3's success. The file quality that the D3 produces looks
more like a file from a 17 megapixel camera. That should
be reason enough to consider this camera for any subject
but especially for those seeking published magazine covers
and double page spreads, and those who make gallery print
enlargements. Keep in mind the extremely clean ISO settings
of 400, 500, 640 and 800 while even 1000-1600 look fantastic
and will enable the landscape, nature and wildlife photographers
to work in lower light conditions and use faster shutter
speeds or larger aperture settings. Nikon D3, ISO800,
1/320 at f7.1, Nikon 200-400 G VR Zoom Lens, WB 6670K,
Lexar 8G Flash Card.
|
Question #5 "In last months article of Workshop
at the Ranch you mentioned that you have purchased some
new equipment like the Nikon 1.7 converter and a 70-300mm
f4.5-5.6 G VR Zoom Lens,..Why? ......... are you using
the two together?"
Answer/Image #5 Parrot Profile ... No, the TC17E 1.7
Teleconverter and the Nikon 70-300mm Lens do not connect.
The two pieces of equipment cannot be used together. I
was merely pointing out that lenses with slower apertures
will become more useful because the photographer can compensate
for the slower aperture by using a higher ISO and not
diminish the quality of the picture with excessive noise.
Slower aperture lenses are smaller, lighter in weight,
and sometimes less expensive than lenses boasting apertures
of f2.8 or f2. Photographers who are active in the field
hiking, rock climbing, mountaineering, following wildlife,
or those shooting from confined locations like a boat,
airplane, or even a crowded market place in a foreign
country need smaller/lighter lenses but have in the past
sacrificed image quality because of the need to use higher
ISO settings to compensate for the slower aperture. The
70-300mm G VR Zoom Lens with its variable aperture of
f4.5-f5.6 would normally be considered a slower lens but
when mounted to a D3 it becomes more acceptable because
I can increase the ISO and not sacrifice quality. This
profile of a parrot was photographed with the Nikon 70-300mm
f4.5-5.6 G VR Zoom Lens at its maximum focal length of
300mm which results in an apeture of f5.6. There is almost
no light left in the day and the dense canopy of trees
and vegetation made for a very dark environment. The Nikon
70-300 G VR Zoom Lens worked very well. It is small and
light weight. It is very sharp edge to edge even at 300mm
and has fast focusing and VR stabilization. Before the
D3 came along I would have used a low ISO of 400 to maintain
clean publishable quality. The "old" solution
would have been a 300mm f2.8 lens and an exposure of 1/30
at f2.8 (that would require a tripod or monopod....more
gear/weight.) This is a large and heavy lens for someone
to carry for 10 hours while hiking. The D3 allowed me
to increase the ISO to 3200 and retain excellent image
quality with a small amount of noise that looks similar
to a D2Xs file at ISO400. I can now easily hand hold the
camera with the smaller 70-300mm lens and shoot at an
exposure of 1/60 at f5.6. Nikon D3, ISO3200, 1/60 at f5.6,
Nikon 70-300 f4.5-f5.6 G VR Zoom Lens (I zoomed to 300mm
f5.6), WB Auto A6 (there are optional settings for the
Auto WB mode that can add warmth or coolness to an Auto
WB setting, A1-A6 adds warmth; A6 being the warmest, while
B1-B6 adds coolness; B6 being the coolest), Lexar 8G Flash
Card. For those photographers who require extremely long
focal lengths for sports coverage or wildlife adding a
Nikon TC17E 1.7 Teleconverter to a lens like a 400mm f2.8
produces a tremendous focal length of 650mm but a slow
wide open aperture of f4.8. The D3 allows the increase
of ISO which compensates for the slower aperture when
adding the 1.7 Teleconverter and still retains great image
quality. The use of a teleconverter now becomes useful
even for a nighttime sporting event like football and
baseball or for wildlife photography under cloudy skies
and inclement weather conditions.
|
|
Question
#6 "Does the D3 Picture Control feature replace Photoshop?"
Answer/Image #6 Church at Trinidad ... No, I don't
think the Picture Control options in the Nikon D3 will
replace Photoshop or Nikon Capture NX, but I do believe
some rendering can be done in the D3 camera at the moment
of capture and less enhancement in post processing with
the computer. That is a very important time saver for
many photographers. There have always been rendering enhancement
and color mode options in digital cameras. With the exception
of White Balance I, for the most part, have not made use
of these options. The reason was two fold for me; 1. Enhancements
that were programmable within previous cameras tended
to diminish the quality of the image slightly. Extra saturation
or extra sharpening seemed to hurt the picture quality
more than helping it. Keep in mind I'm talking about pictures
that are being published or printed large. The Nikon D200
was the first camera I occasionally used the Vivid setting
and was pleased with the results but only with ISO settings
of ISO400 or less. 2. Most publications and editors I
work with usually require the RAW/NEF file for publication
and so there was no point in adding enhancements because
the magazine or book would do so on their end. The Nikon
D3 has several choices in the Picture Control menu. I
have been using Vivid because it seems to replicate Velvia
film in its colors and tonality. But if one goes deeper
into the menu there are some very precise controls for
Sharpening, Contrast, Brightness, Saturation, and Hue.
Although I'm still experimenting with these "in camera"
rendering tools one thing seems clear, that the quality
of the image is not diminished by increasing or decreasing
the enhancements even at the higher ISO settings. Perhaps
this is because of the Nikon FX Format CMOS Imaging Sensor
and the extremely low noise capabilities. At any rate,
the proof is in the printing/publishing so to speak and
I like the results I'm seeing. If you are a photographer
who enjoys laboring over a picture for hours in Photoshop
then Picture Control is not for you. I, on the other hand,
like to take more pictures and spend less time at the
computer. Using Picture Control enhancements will probably
be a learning curve for both the photographer and editor
alike. The Picture Control menu also offers a Sepia tone
and Monochromatic (Black and White) setting, each with
a variety of Tone and Filter options. Nikon D3, ISO100(Lo
1), 1/640 at f9, Nikon 24-70 Lens, WB 6250K, Picture Control
Monochromatic with Sharpening +3, Contrast +2, Brightness
+1, Filter Green, Toning Black & White, Lexar 8G Flash
Card.
|
I hope this additional look at the Nikon D3
camera has been helpful. My intent was to answer some of the
email questions that I received in November. I hadn't planned
on addressing the camera again but felt compelled by the flood
of emails. Hope you don't find it too redundant.
I'm looking forward to the new year, 2008, and what opportunities
lay just over the hill. I hope many of you will return for more
learning here on Workshop at the Ranch.
Adios ................ Dave
WORKSHOPS and PRESENTATION Schedule
August 15-17 ..... American PHOTO Mentor Series Trek: New Jersey
www.mentorseries.com
August 26 ... ASMP Atlanta: Presentation of Images with Commentary
and Q&A. Atlanta, Georgia ... (non-members are also welcome) www.asmpatlanta.org
September 21-25 ... Rich Clarkson's Adventure Photography Workshop
in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. www.richclarkson.com
September 28- October 3 ..... Rich Clarkson's Photography at the Summit
in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. www.richclarkson.com
April 14-22, 2009 ... Photo Quest Adventures, The Netherlands.
www.photoquestadventures.com
|
|
|